A former Alberta WCB Case Manager made some very serious
allegations of fraud against the WCB in an article from the Edmonton Journal
Sept. 11/99
Pressure on at WCB, ex-staffer says \ Case managers
encouraged to denyclaims, cut payouts to injured workers.
Case
managers at the provincial Workers Compensation Board are pressured by
their supervisors to deny claims or reduce payouts to injured workers as a
cost-saving measure, claims a former WCB employee.
The WCB looks for
ways to save money by minimizing the income-support payment s injured workers
receive, and by reducing their permanent disability awards, says former case
manager Kevin Becker.
Its done in a very convert
ways, said Becker, who worked for the WCB from 1991 to 1997.
You (the case manager) put in an earning loss claim for a worker, and
your manager will come back and say No, we can save money if we say the
employee is capable of doing some work, when we know hes
not.
Or you are told to tell the injured worker he had a
pre-existing condition, like arthritis in his back and he isnt eligible
for disability payments. Its that kind of thing. He said the
WCBs prime strategy seems to be a war of attrition keep
denying and the worker will give up.
Becker, who has a consulting
firm and also is an advocate for injured workers having trouble getting WCB
payments, said the practices appear to be the same today as they were when he
left two years ago. The focus is on liability how much liability
are case managers able to clear away to protect the WCB fund, he said.
But a WCB official denied Beckers claims, saying the boards
primary focus is on customer satisfaction, both for employers and for injured
workers.
Beckers comments come as Human Resources Minister Clint
Dunford is deciding whether to investigate a number of complaints against the
WCB by injured workers. Becker didnt blame individual case managers or
supervisors. Instead, he blamed a corporate culture which he says pays more
attention to the bottom line than to injured workers. They have lost
sight of what theyre supposed to be, which is protection for the
worker, he said.
Employees who save the WCB the most money tend to
get promoted while those who are deemed to be too generous to injured workers
are often forced out of their jobs, he added. The system generates a lot
of statistics on which case managers are costing the most, he said.
Those who are, tend to get ridden a lot harder by supervisors.
Theres a lot of constructive dismissal.
But a WCB official
disputed his allegations. At no time has there been any motive for case
managers to deny benefits, said Nancy Saul-Demers, director of corporate
communications for the WCB. She said staff members are paid bonuses based on
worker and employer satisfaction, not on the amount of money the WCB saves.
Any bonuses they receive are tied to corporate objective that revolve
around customer satisfaction, she said. The motivation is to ensure
that workers are satisfied. We wouldnt try to do that by reducing
benefits.
WCB payouts for income support, medical costs and
rehabilitation have been increasing yearly, which She cited as proof the WCB
isnt slashing benefits to save money. The average cost per claim has
r8isen to $9,200 this year from $8,500 in 1997.
But Becker said he
noticed a shift in attitude in 1993 and 1994, as the WCB attacked its mounting
deficit.
They started digging up old claims, he said.
We were told to take a look at old earning losses and to see if we could
reduce it. We were phoning up workers who had received entitlements for years,
and saying weve just reviewed it, and decided that youre capable of
earning more, and next week your cheque will be less.
He left in
1997 to do human resources consulting work for the David Thompson Health
Authority. He also turned his WCB experience into a career in workers
advocacy.
:Its my impression the WCB has become much worse
since I left, he said.